September 24, 2007 by alex
Last week was RailsConf 2007 in Berlin. Only a couple of days have passed and it already seems so far away. Time for some blogging before everybody forgets that it even took place and nobody’s going to read this :) So here’s the interesting part of the sessions I attended:
This was the first session on tutorial day and for me one of the most interesting. It basically gave a looong introduction to behavior driven design, how it evolved from things like TDD and who realized what while enganged in which project back in the good old times. One of the interesting parts for me was when they talked about the whole story writing/specification process. I had heard most of it before but it was a good refreshment. The central statement was to write “Software that matters”, and to achieve this, you’d have to get the specs right - as we XPers know this should be done by collecting user stories. The suggested format for such a story was this:
As a [role] I want [feature] so that [outcome]
As an administrator I want to see the list of users so that i can choose which one to delete.
Great, a template for writing story cards. Following the story, you need an acceptance test that verifies that the story has been implemented. The suggested format is this:
given [context] given [more context] when [event] when ... then [outcome] then ...
Given i am logged in as root Given a list of users When i view /users Then i see all the users
Now in the early days you would write this on a story card or on some other maybe non-digital, maybe digital surface, but you would not do this: run the acceptance test as code. (I’m aware there are some projects who’ve tried/done it but I’ve never found one too convincing and really used it). Now you can. They actually implemented a new feature in rspec trunk called StoryRunner to do exactly this and here’s how it looks:
How cool is that, but it doesn’t even stop here. You can now reuse the code blocks you have created (!!):
Ok, technically speaking it’s actually not much more than reusing code but the way it’s done in StoryRunner, you are almost forced to create your own, application specific testing DSL! (Did I mention how fantastic this is?). For a better example which includes a “normal” rails integration test and compares it to an rspec story implementation see the evang.ei.st blog.
Of course they also showed the “usual” rspec stuff (referred to as “classic rspec”) for specing models and controllers. I you haven’t already go back to the evang.eli.st and check out Easy Controller Tests and Expressing Intent Through Expectations - a really good (imho) introduction on writing controllers using
test spec first.
Enough for now, I’m sure there will be more on rspec here soon.